Infyro Research

Thematic equity research focused on AI disruption

Infyro Research was founded in early 2026, with the mission of investigating the true impact of emerging artificial intelligence tools on software & Internet business models.

infyroresearch@gmail.com

Articles

Loading articles...

Coverage basket
External peer
Scorecard methodology

Each company is scored 0–4 on five factors. Two measure risk (higher = more exposed); three measure protection or upside (higher = more shielded, or more of a beneficiary). The Net AI Disruption Score averages each side to a common scale, then takes the difference: avg(Pricing exposure, Margin exposure) − avg(Moat durability, Demand tailwind, AI response). Positive = net disruption risk. Negative = net AI beneficiary. Range runs roughly −4 to +4.

FactorWhat it measuresDirection
Seat/license pricing exposureShare of revenue tied to per-seat or per-license pricing that AI agents could compress or let customers automate aroundRisk (0–4)
Margin exposure to AI/inference costsWhether embedding AI features pressures gross margin, versus the company being a supplier that benefits from others' AI capexRisk (0–4)
Data & workflow moat durabilityHow defensible the incumbent's proprietary data, integrations, and switching costs are against an AI-native challengerProtective (0–4)
AI-driven demand tailwindDirect revenue/volume upside from other companies' AI buildout — chips, power, cooling, automation, logisticsUpside (0–4)
Competitive AI responseHow credible and fast the company's own AI product strategy is at defending or growing shareProtective (0–4)

Scores are a first-pass, directional read based on thesis groupings and company notes, not yet a fully researched pass in the way the Tokenomics figures are sourced and cross-checked. Treat them as a starting hypothesis per company, to be refined with real diligence (earnings-call language, disclosed AI-related revenue, customer commentary) before drawing firm conclusions.

Tokenomics

Avg. input cost $1.88/M
Avg. output cost $9.05/M
Cheapest model $0.035/$0.14 Amazon Nova Micro
Priciest model $10.00/$50.00 Claude Fable 5.1 & GPT-6 Astra (tied)
Flagship model pricing lineage — trailing 3 years (blended $/M tokens, log scale)
Provider / Model Tier Input $/M tokens Output $/M tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 AstraFlagship$10.00$50.00
GPT-5.6 TerraBalanced$2.00$12.00
GPT-5.6 LunaFast / affordable$0.20$1.20
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5.1Flagship$10.00$50.00
Claude Opus 5High-capability$5.00$25.00
Claude Sonnet 5Balanced$2.00$10.00
Claude Haiku 4.5Fast / affordable$1.00$5.00
Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewFlagship (≤200k / >200k ctx)$2.00 / $4.00$12.00 / $18.00
Gemini 3.8 FlashBalanced (intro pricing to Dec 2026)$0.75$3.75
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteFast / affordable$0.25$1.50
xAI
Grok 4.6Flagship (≤200k / >200k ctx)$2.00 / $4.00$6.00 / $12.00
Grok 4.3Balanced$1.25$2.50
Meta
Llama 4 MaverickFlagship$0.19$0.65
Llama 4 ScoutBalanced$0.10$0.30
Llama 3.3 70BFast / affordable$0.10$0.32
Mistral
Mistral Large 3Flagship$0.50$1.50
Mistral Medium 3.5Balanced$1.50$7.50
Mistral Small 4Fast / affordable$0.15$0.60
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 ProFlagship$0.66$1.98
DeepSeek FlashFast / affordable$0.15$0.60
Amazon
Nova PremierFlagship$2.50$12.50
Nova ProBalanced$0.80$3.20
Nova MicroFast / affordable$0.035$0.14

List API pricing as published by each provider (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, Mistral, DeepSeek), correct as of September 2026. Meta and Amazon figures reflect third-party hosted pricing (via OpenRouter) rather than a simple official flat rate, since neither sells direct API access the same way. DeepSeek publishes separate peak-hour pricing (roughly 2x the off-peak rates shown). Excludes prompt-caching, batch, and long-context surcharge discounts, which vary by provider — see each provider's own pricing page for the fine print. Quality-adjusted value (price relative to benchmark/task performance) is a planned follow-on, not yet built.

Averages and cheapest/priciest above are computed across all 23 models in the table. The two context-tiered models (Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, Grok 4.6) use their base (≤200k context) rate for this calculation.